Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> > The 18-55 has some W-shape distortions ... a good lens but not really > at its best for architecture. The DA16-45 has a bit of simple barrel > distortion, easy to correct. The 20-35 has less and has nicer > rendering qualities. > Rendering-wise, the DA16-45 is substantially nicer than the 18-55, > and its constant f/4 is also a boon. > I have found that the distortions shown by the DA 18-55 are easily corrected by using PT Lens, and the 18-55 is a really good performer for its price. But I am sure the 16-45 is a better lens. Carlos -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
