On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 07:40:00AM -0800, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > > On Jan 14, 2007, at 4:15 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote: > > > I'm surprised. I'll have to see how my Extreme III compares to my 150X > > Transcend. (I don't have it yet.) I know my Sandisk Ultra II cards > > don't seem to be a lot slower in the camera than the Transcend card. > > My test showed about 18% for RAW and 12% for JPEG difference in write > speeds between Sandisk II and Transcend 150x. > http://homepage.mac.com/godders/Pentax-DS-150x-timing/ > It isn't anything like a doubling of performance, which the NNNx > numbers would imply.
That would be consistent with the Ultra II (a 60x card, I believe) managing to write at almost the same rate as it can read, while the Transcend 150x slows down by about a factor of two (to 75x or so). -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
