Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > My testing showed that the Transcend 150x is faster than the Sandisk > Ultra II (60x), but others have suggested that the Sandisk Extreme > III (133x) is actually faster than the Transcend 150x by a > significant percentage (10-15%).
I haven't done any formal testing but the Extreme III is noticeably faster than the Transcend even without formal testing. The transcend cards are still pretty fast though. > In practical terms, even the Sandisk Ultra IIs perform so well with > the K10D that they eclipse the performance of the *ist DS body > completely. I have not found any difficulty whatever in using them: > the camera writes more swiftly than I need it to so as not to be a > hindrance to my shooting. When I revert to the *ist-D (slowest of the *ist family, no doubt)I really cringe - especially shooting RAW. It is downright laborious.... - MCC -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mark Cassino Photography Kalamazoo, Michigan www.markcassino.com - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
