I disagree. As a seller, I never leave feedback until the buyer does. There's a risk of being blackmailed by unscrupulous buyers if you commit too soon to positive feedback. I've heard many horror stories of buyers complaining about merchandise and requesting a refund right after they received positive feedback. The seller has the most to lose in this situation. It's better to wait. If the buyer never posts feedback, I don't either. Works for me. Paul On Jan 23, 2007, at 7:44 PM, keith_w wrote:
> Perry Pellechia wrote: >> On 1/23/07, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> If I win an item, pay promptly and in all ways stay within the >>> confines of >>> the published terms of the auction, then the seller should be >>> giving me >>> positive feedback without holding my giving positive feedback as >>> part of the >>> deal. >>> To do otherewise isn't ethical. > > >> I agree 100%. I just bought a Optech strap from an eBay dealer >> and he >> "thanked" me for the sale and wrote "you can anticipate us leaving >> positive feedback for you ... when you have posted positive feedback >> for us." >> >> This is BS. I bought the item via buy-it-now and paid immediately. >> He should be leaving positive feedback for me at that moment. I have >> lived up to my part of the deal and feedback should not be considered >> part of the payment. >> >> Needless to say I am not going to be making any repeat business with >> this dealer nor will I be leaving any feedback. > > > I'm on your side, Perry. He's out of line... > > keith whaley > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
