Perry Pellechia wrote:
>On 1/23/07, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>I disagree. As a seller, I never leave feedback until the buyer does. >>There's a risk of being blackmailed by unscrupulous buyers if you >>commit too soon to positive feedback. I've heard many horror stories >>of buyers complaining about merchandise and requesting a refund right >>after they received positive feedback. The seller has the most to >>lose in this situation. It's better to wait. If the buyer never posts >>feedback, I don't either. Works for me. >>Paul >> >> > >A sellers could look at my feedback and determine that I am a trusted >buyer or not. Combined with my prompt payment, this should be more >than enough for them to decide they could place the feedback that is >deserved. If their product is how they described then they should >also be assured that I will have no reason to complain. > >Perry. > You only need to get stung once, though. The buyer isn't harmed by you waiting.. I leave pos feedback for all buyers who paid me, whether they have left me feedback or not - but usually I wait until I know they have received it and it is past time for them to ask for a return. I'm happy to say I rarely have had returns or even requests for one. I don't sell much stuff that appeals to persnickity buyers or is very high end. But when I sell something kinda expensive for someone else (like a vintage PUCCI dress that isn't flawless) and I don't see feedback after a couple of weeks I might write and ask for reassurance they are pleased and have received package safely if sent somewhere I cant track it. I never fight with them or demand stuff or virtually yell, no matter what. ann > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
