You're not listening.  RCA's research developed the soon to be Sony 
"aperture grill" system originally for B&W. This gave a much improved, 
(sharper), picture.  They were selling as many old style B&W sets as 
they could make and didn't feel the extra cost was worth the 
improvement, (there may have been picture brightness issues, which would 
have required further development, I don't know about that, but the 
system improved perceived sharpness).  They sold the patents to Sony. 

J. C. O'Connell wrote:
> I dont think monochrome CRTs have shadow masks or
> as sony liked to call them "aperture grilles". this
> is one of the main reasons its much easier
> to make a bright high resolution mono crt compared
> to a bright high res color crt.
> jco
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> P. J. Alling
> Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 12:24 AM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: 85mm f1.8 SMCT on ebay : $400+
>
>
> The Trinitron system used RCA's improved electron gun design and masking
>
> technology which made the one gun Color Tube possible.
>
> J. C. O'Connell wrote:
>   
>> I dont follow that, the uniqueness of the
>> trinitron was it was a one gun system for
>> color which usually used three guns. A one
>> gun monochrome CRT was already standard.
>> Can you elusidate further?
>> jco
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf 
>> Of P. J. Alling
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 9:01 PM
>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> Subject: Re: 85mm f1.8 SMCT on ebay : $400+
>>
>>
>> Trinitron was based on RCA patents for a superior B&W set.  RCA of
>> course didn't see any need to have a better set and sold them to Sony.
>>     
>
>   
>> The rest is history.
>>
>> Cory Papenfuss wrote:
>>   
>>     
>>>     I'm jumping in a bit late on this, but I've got a couple of 
>>> comments about my opinion of Sony
>>>   
>>>     
>>>       
>>>> Re Sony, they are a respectable company and noone has any doubt 
>>>> about
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>   
>>     
>>>> it. But since the overhaul of thier executive structures, it has 
>>>> been
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>   
>>     
>>>> a known fact that they have been struggling and stumbling in 
>>>> consumer
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>   
>>     
>>>> electronic market.
>>>>     
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>>     Margins too low anymore.  They've had to cheapify consumer stuff
>>>       
>
>   
>>> for the past 20 years.  At least in their home theater stuff
>>>     
>>>       
>> (receivers,
>>   
>>     
>>> amps, DVD players, VCR's), quality is the same or worse as any other
>>> cheepie no-name brand... only more expensive because it's a "Sony."
>>>     
>>>       
>> One
>>   
>>     
>>> of their last great innovations that actually succeeded (IMO) was
>>> Trinitron.  They were without question the best available CRTs for
>>>     
>>>       
>> dozens
>>   
>>     
>>> of years.  Most other innovations are me-too's, together with a HUGE
>>>     
>>>       
>> smack
>>   
>>     
>>> of arrogance and proprietary stuff (think mini-disc and memory 
>>> stick).
>>>
>>>   It became a known patter recently that they search for what they
>>>   
>>>     
>>>       
>>>> perceive to be profitable market, explore them, but if they found
>>>> they are not for them, they are too quick to fold up.  It was not 
>>>> like that before. Look at Cleo (or whatever is called, a Palm PDA) 
>>>> from which they retreated. Their portable audio is overwhelmed by 
>>>> iPod, and much touted Play Station stuff is now seem to be in limbo.
>>>>         
>
>   
>>>> Theyb are still a king in the institutional market.  They have been 
>>>> producing great imaging products.  But they are operating like a
>>>>         
> fire
>   
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>   
>>     
>>>> drill and still seraching for the directions and goals in "consumer
>>>> electronics" area. Those are the facts which is substantiated by 
>>>> CFO's uttering.
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>>     I'm pretty sure that in their professional gear, the quality is 
>>> still there.  Of course the prices are higher and the margins are
>>>     
>>>       
>> fatter.
>>   
>>     
>>> At least if you buy a professional-grade Sony product though, you get
>>>     
>>>       
>> what
>>   
>>     
>>> you pay for.
>>>
>>>   
>>>     
>>>       
>>>> I wish they did not have a propriatary hot shoe.... :-).
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>>     See above about Sony's love of proprietary sh*t.
>>>
>>> -Cory
>>> <\rant_mode>
>>>   
>>>     
>>>       
>>   
>>     
>
>
>   


-- 
--

The more I know of men, the more I like my dog.
                        -- Anne Louise Germaine de Stael


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to