I think the one you are talking about went for $73K jco -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Stenquist Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2007 10:30 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Web Gallery : Barrett-JacksonCollectorCarAuctions2007WestPalmBeach...
John, Do you know what the selling price was for the 56 Chevy BelAir Convertible? Paul On Apr 1, 2007, at 10:24 PM, J. C. O'Connell wrote: > I guess I didnt make this clear enough, I dont > do "lowest common denominator" web photos, if your > screen cant show them fully as I want them to be seen, > then you simply dont GET to see them. Even reducing > them to 800 pixels wide "ruins" them IHMO. > jco > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of > John Celio > Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2007 10:04 PM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: Web Gallery : Barrett-Jackson > CollectorCarAuctions2007WestPalmBeach... > > > JCO, you may have a large screen or eyes that can handle super-high > resolution, but not everyone is so blessed. I, for instance, use my > laptop > for everything, and it has a 15.4" screen. I don't like having it set > to a > super-high resolution because that makes text too small to read > comfortably. > > Also, one of the first things I learned regarding webdesign is to > set up > > your site so that the greatest number of people will be able to > view it > comfortably. Since my website's stats show 1024x768 being the > most-often > used resolution by my visitors, I design for that resolution. If you > really > must have larger photos, just spend the time to make smaller versions > too. > You may consider it a waste of time, but you'll keep a lot more of > your > visitors if you don't force them to have to scroll around every time > they > want to look at one of your photos. I only looked at a few of your > photos > (which were really nice, by the way. I love many of those cars) > before > I > got tired of having to scroll every time and went on to something > else. > > John > > -- > http://www.neovenator.com http://www.cafepress.com/neovenatorphoto > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
