The 'magnification' factor is one of the reasons I have not truly looked at a digital SLR. I have started to enjoy wide angle shooting and would not relish having to get a 17mm to get a 25mm. And I have heard of the problems with distortion with the 17mms. People have corrected this with photo s/w but again something I do not relish doing.
Another aspect of the 'magnification' factor is that with only the central part of the lens being used people have been finding they have to really watch the shutter speed as any motion is more noticeable since the image is enlarged more to get the same size image as with a non-digital SLR. Though people point out that you are using the 'sweet spot' of lenses if you are not using toward the edges. By the end of next month I should have the possibility to begin spending some time with a Nikon D1x and D1H here at work. I am still looking at Pentax since most of my lenses are in that system and I love the glass I have. César Matamoros II Panama City, Florida > -----Original Message----- > From: Bruce Dayton [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 2:54 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Pentax Digital NEWS! Part one > > Currently, no SLR on the shelf from Nikon or Canon has a full frame CCD. > Telephoto lenses are also multiplied. If you shoot lots of telephoto, > this > could be an advantage. The point I was making was that part of the reason > to use Pentax is that I already have the lenses. But if the CCD isn't > full > frame, then I will have to do some changes on the wide end. If I am going > to make changes, it gives me more reason to look seriously at the > competition. > > Bruce Dayton > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 11:43 AM > Subject: Re: Pentax Digital NEWS! Part one > > > > Do other quality digital cameras offer FF CCD that can be used with the > > lenses from their SLRs? What happens with a telephoto lens - is, for > > example, a 300mm lens longer or shorter when used with a less than FF > > CCD? > > > > Also, how does Fuji (?) get 6mp from a CCD that is only rated at 3mp? > > Doesn't that screw with quality, especially with larger prints? > > > > Bruce Dayton wrote: > > > > > > The big advantage to a full frame CCD is that our existing wide angle > lenses > > > will remain as such. Nothing quite so exciting as having your 20mm > behave > > > like it was a 35mm. So, if I have to buy some new lenses (I like > wides), > > > then why buy Pentax. It seems to me, that lens compatibility with my > > > *existing* lenses is a big reason to consider a digital Pentax. > > > > > > So now I look at a company who appears not to want to compete in this > arena > > > coupled with me having to revamp part of my system. Sure pushes me to > want > > > to look at competitors who are competing and providing equipment at a > much > > > faster rate. > > > > -- > > Shel Belinkoff > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .