Profits are a good thing. However when the next Pentax DSLR has a zillion useless features, and the build quality, viewfinder and ergonomics of a Rebel 300D you can ask that same question again.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > -------------- Original message ---------------------- > From: mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>> From: Sylwester Pietrzyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> Date: 2007/05/31 Thu PM 12:28:26 GMT >>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> >>> Subject: Re: What Hoya has to say now >>> >>> I don't think Hoya will close Pentax camera division, especially SLR >>> one, which is profitabe. And that's what exactly financial analysts >>> say: "What Hoya should do from now is build on Pentax's strengths in >>> endoscopes, SLR cameras and optical devices,'' Hisashi Moriyama, a >>> Tokyo-based analyst with JP Morgan Securities Co., said by telephone. >>> "Hoya should have no problem raising Pentax's profitability with its >>> existing products.'' >>> >> That is just as (if not more) scary as the possibility of closure. >> > > HAR! Talk about finding a cloud in the silver lining. Profit is a bad thing? > > -- All dogs have four legs; my cat has four legs. Therefore, my cat is a dog. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net