Profits are a good thing.  However when the next Pentax DSLR has a 
zillion useless features, and the build quality, viewfinder and 
ergonomics of a Rebel 300D you can ask that same question again.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>  -------------- Original message ----------------------
> From: mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>   
>>> From: Sylwester Pietrzyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> Date: 2007/05/31 Thu PM 12:28:26 GMT
>>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net>
>>> Subject: Re: What Hoya has to say now
>>>
>>> I don't think Hoya will close Pentax camera division, especially SLR  
>>> one, which is profitabe. And that's what exactly financial analysts  
>>> say: "What Hoya should do from now is build on Pentax's strengths in  
>>> endoscopes, SLR cameras and optical devices,'' Hisashi Moriyama, a  
>>> Tokyo-based analyst with JP Morgan Securities Co., said by telephone.  
>>> "Hoya should have no problem raising Pentax's profitability with its  
>>> existing products.''
>>>       
>> That is just as (if not more) scary as the possibility of closure.
>>     
>
> HAR! Talk about finding a cloud in the silver lining. Profit is a bad thing?
>
>   


-- 
All dogs have four legs; my cat has four legs. Therefore, my cat is a dog.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to