> Well I guess, my problem is that I consider news photos as editorial

> illustrations, not some super meaningful documentation. 

Yes, I can see how that would be a problem and lead you into all sorts
of difficulties.

> Strangely without 
> captions those particular photos have no particular meaning 
> at all, 

That's true of almost all news / reportage photographs, almost by
definition. What's your point?

--
 Bob
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
> Behalf Of graywolf
> Sent: 27 September 2007 18:09
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: Chicken or Egg Photo Story - NY Times
> 
> Well I guess, my problem is that I consider news photos as editorial

> illustrations, not some super meaningful documentation. 
> Strangely without 
> captions those particular photos have no particular meaning 
> at all, a dirt road 
> somewhere with a bunch of round stones. The are called 
> critics because they are 
> critical you have to take anything they say with a grain of salt.
> 
> If the Iwo Jima photo was taken in a studio in California is 
> it an any less 
> powerful image? Would it have less meaning to a people at 
> war? It is easy to sit 
> in our comfortable living rooms decades later and talk about 
> it as if it were 
> some kind of conspiracy, but it was a powerful wartime 
> propaganda photo 
> regardless of when and where and how it was taken.
> 
> The error comes in thinking of news photos as some kind of 
> archaeological 
> documentation made for later generations. They are not, nor 
> were they intended 
> as such.
> 
> 
> Bob W wrote:
> > it's important to challenge people who claim without evidence that
> > important historical or journalistic photos, or writings or
whatever
> > are in some way fake or misleading. It's important because it is
> > through history and news (which is after all only history 
> with the ink
> > still wet) that we gain our understanding of the world and our
place
> > in it. It is through news and history that we learn, so as not to
> > repeat earlier mistakes, and only by being able to trust the
sources
> > of history and news is that possible. 
> > 
> > There always seem to be claims of fakery swirling around some of
the
> > most important news photos - the flag on Iwo Jima, Capa's Falling
> > Soldier, now this one. I'm sure I could think of more if I 
> put my mind
> > to it. These claims, when false, undermine people's ability to
trust
> > news photography and play into the hands of people who wish to
> > manipulate the news, history and us. 
> > 
> > On another level, if someone like Susan Sontag, a respected
critic,
> > was sloppy in the research on which she based an important 
> book which
> > has influenced many people's views on news photography, then we
need
> > to know about that because it must affect the way we look at all
her
> > writing, and the many consequences of her writing.
> > 
> > --
> >  Bob
> >  
> > 
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
> >> Behalf Of graywolf
> >> Sent: 26 September 2007 22:45
> >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >> Subject: Re: Chicken or Egg Photo Story - NY Times
> >>
> >> Why is it so interesting? I see nothing that makes any 
> >> difference to anyone but 
> >> a few folks who want to be taken for pundits. The lighting 
> >> shows that the sun 
> >> was more overhead in the second photo, but if the 
> >> photographer was into faking 
> >> his photos, he could well have lied about the time he took 
> >> them. It reminds me 
> >> of the title to one of Shakespeare's plays, "Much ado about
> > nothing".
> >>
> >>>> Subject: Chicken or Egg Photo Story - NY Times
> >>>>
> >>>> http://tinyurl.com/2oczre
> >> -- 
> >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >> PDML@pdml.net
> >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly 
> >> above and follow the directions.
> >>
> >>
> > 
> > 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly 
> above and follow the directions.
> 
> 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to