Did you have the A version or the F version? I have had both and my A
version
is better than the F which I sold. Dont forget, I am talking about near
range
usage and at small fstops like 11-22 because the flash is powerful enough
to allow those stops even at iso 200. I have no idea if its any good at
infinity
or anywhere near wide open, but if used like I am using it, its damn nice,
not too expensive, and good build quality too.( I ususally dont like most
A lenses in terms of build, but this one aint bad.)
jco

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam
Maas
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 10:56 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: GREAT "general purpose" Zoom for the Pentax DSLRS?


Tried one out at one point. It was alright, but not any better than the
18-55 DA in its range, larger, heavier, harder to manual focus due to lack
of contrast wide open at 24mm. Wasn't much impressed with it on digital. Of
course, I may have had a bad sample.

-Adam

On 3/10/08, Walter Hamler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Never seen that particular lens. I had a 35~105 years ago that I  
> really liked except it was pretty heavy.  My biggest problem is at my 
> age the AF is almost a requirement anymore  :-)
>
>  Walt
>
>
>  On 3/10/08, J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > I have been using for about a month now the SMC PENTAX-A 24-50/4.0  
> > Zoom almost exclusively ( mostly product photos for ebay on  > 
> tabletop ) on my *istDS DSLR. Its a two ring zoom so you never  > get 
> any annoying "zoom creep" and it holds focus perfectly  > when 
> zooming. The F4 speed is a little slow but the lens is so  > contrasty 
> that its easy to focus at 50mm ( I use a split image  > screen - third 
> party model - in my *istDS ). Anyway, after you  > figure in the 1.5X 
> lens factor you are left with a 35mm SLR  > equiv of 36mm to 75mm 
> which is a very versatile "super normal"  > lens. This model is 
> extremely contrasty, great color saturation,  > and freedom from 
> flaring. It works beautifully for tabletop  > product photography. I 
> have never needed wider or longer, as it  > has a pretty decent 
> magnification at 50mm and min focus. The constant  > aperture (F4 thru 
> the zoom range) is great when using manual full  > power flash like I 
> like to do.  >
>  > Anyway, if you do a lot of ebay or similar product photography for web,
>  > I recommend this lens very highly. Much more versitile than a
>  > prime or macro 50mm with the 24m capability.
>  >
>  > I must add I have never used the stock 18-55mm that was sold
>  > with the camera, but I doubt it can match this lens, let alone
>  > beat it. Maybe it can? Anyone ever compared the two in the 24-50mm
>  > range?
>  >
>  > jco
>  >
>  >
>  > --
>  > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>  > PDML@pdml.net
>  > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>  > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.
>  >
>
>  --
>  PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>  PDML@pdml.net
>  http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>  to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above 
> and follow the directions.
>


-- 
M. Adam Maas
http://www.mawz.ca
Explorations of the City Around Us.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to