Christine Aguila wrote: > I said a lot, & hopefully some of it was useful. All-in-all, I say get the > printer.
That was *all* useful, Christine; thank you very much! I am greatly encouraged by your experiences. An in-house printer does indeed sound like the way to go. BTW: did you go through the full colour calibration process as Godfrey mentioned, or did you get your great results "out of the box"? George, thanks for the Canon suggestion. I actually own an old cheapie Canon Bubblejet printer (which is largely why I assumed that photo-printing technology wasn't far enough advanced yet :-). I will also check into the Pixma Pro9500 as you suggest. My initial check shows it to be pricier then the 2880 ($900 vs $700), but with rebates etc., who knows. And thank-you to everyone who commented in this thread. Extremely enlightening! -bmw -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
