It's crap, crap, crap, the extra stop isn't worth it at all, but I did get it real cheap :)
--- Aaron Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Saturday, January 5, 2002, at 03:19 AM, Flavio > Minelli wrote: > > > Did you ever wonder why there are > > so many used Sigma 28-105/2.8 for sale? That one > is real crap and the > > fast (relativeley) aperture is just bait... > > I totally agree. My SMC-M 28mm f2.8 (which is the > worst lens I own in > my estimation) easily outperforms it. In fact, the > only lens that I've > used that I would consider worse than it at 28mm is > the Pentax 28-200 > (though we might have had a bad sample -- when I was > working at Sterling > we ended up sending the one we had in the store back > to Pentax after > doing a lens test). > > Brendan can tell you about the Sigma 28-105 f2.8-4. > He bought one (from > me) against my recommendation...and whaddaya think > about it, Brendan? :) > ______________________________________________________ Send your holiday cheer with http://greetings.yahoo.ca - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
