Supposed to be released in 2010. However Pentax already has a
"Flagship". The 645D will be their "Professional" offering.
Bob Sullivan wrote:
For your zoom, try the old A35-105 f3.5.
For a FF camera, I wouldn't be surprised to see Pentax skip to
a 645 format sensor as the flagship.
Regards, Bob S.
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Miserere<miser...@gmail.com> wrote:
Interesting and varied opinions (thanks guys!) although nobody brought
up the issue that bothers me most.
I believe Pentax will *HAVE* TO GO FULL-FRAME, like Mark said, out of
necessity. When this happens (not *if*), what will they do with APS-C?
They cannot give up on it given how much they've invested in DA
lenses, so they will most likely keep an APS-C line up, but how
advanced will these cameras be? I don't think Pentax has the resources
to keep a parallel line of APS-C and FF cameras, so they will probably
introduce only one FF model, which should be their
flagship...relegating APS-C cameras to the entry-level ranks.
What happens then to those of use that like APS-C? I want a K-7 for
its small size (which is an advantage of APS-C not exploited in the
flagship cameras since the *ist D) and other advanced features. I also
happen to like the FoV offered by classic focal length zooms on APS-C
sensors (the Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 is my main lens), and I also like
small primes. Once Pentax make FF their top-of-the line camera, will
they also release a more compact APS-C equivalent? I doubt it. This
means that if I want to upgrade my camera in 2-3 years time, my only
options will be a fully-featured FF model, or a lower-spec'd APS-C.
I fear the K-7 (or its slightly upgraded successor) will be the last
of the great (small bodied) APS-C cameras in the Pentax line-up. And
even if Pentax manage to squeeze a 35mm sensor into a K-7 body, I'm
still left searching for a 40-115mm f/2.8 zoom lens as compact as my
Tammy to serve as my workhorse. I know nobody will ever build one,
least of all Pentax.
Interesting times lie ahead, Gentlemen.
Cheers,
--M.
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
http://www.EnticingTheLight.com
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
--
The free man owns himself. He can damage himself with either eating or
drinking; he can ruin himself with gambling. If he does he is certainly a damn
fool, and he might possibly be a damned soul; but if he may not, he is not a
free man any more than a dog.
--G. K. Chesterton
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
