Mark Roberts wrote:
paul stenquist wrote:
I don't think Pentax will HAVE to go full frame. The 645D will fill
the bill as a high end flagship.
Good lord, even the most wildly optimistic price predictions for the
645D have it costing roughly equal to a Canon 1Ds-III! As of this week
35mm full-frame is $2000 and by this time next year it will be
approaching $1500.
I agree. Here I repeat a concept I've been stressing for years (any of you
remembering my discussions with Shel long time ago?), but I haven't repeated
over the last years, so it's worth doing now. In my view, in practice APS is
the "new" small format (which once used to be 35mm film), 24 x 36 is the
current medium format and everything above that is large format. That
reflects in performance, pricing and diffusion of the different formats.
However, since APS and FF are based on the same bodies/mounts (unlike 35mm
and MF film systems), there's an unprecedented opportunity to merge systems
and reduce price gap. That's just a big plus, due to more tech exchange
between systems of different formats. Anyway, needing two lens outfits for
covering two systems still makes sense. So there's no scandal in owning a
K-7 and its relevant lens/accessories outfit together with say a Nikon D700
and its outfit, if needed. Why not? I believe that also building two kits
within a single make will require two lens outfits in most cases...
Dario
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
