Look at the other specs. the buffer is much larger on the K-7. The
viewfinder is much superior. It's fully sealed, (no mention of seals on
the K-x, but the K-m had none, so I'm assuming). Magnesium shell. Focus
assist. These things may not mean anything to you but they cost money.
There are probably more but those stand out immediately. If they're not
important to you, the K-x is available in colors!
Tim Bray wrote:
Is it just me, or does the K7 now look kind of overpriced, comparing
specs? What do all those extra dollars buy you, especially
considering that small is a feature and the K-x is ahead on that? -T
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
--
The free man owns himself. He can damage himself with either eating or
drinking; he can ruin himself with gambling. If he does he is certainly a damn
fool, and he might possibly be a damned soul; but if he may not, he is not a
free man any more than a dog.
--G. K. Chesterton
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
