On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Ken Waller <kwal...@peoplepc.com> wrote: > Agreed - that the digital workflow takes more time but at least you've got > the control and a much better opportunity at getting a keeper image, at > least as far as exposure/focus is concerned. > > Kenneth Waller
Ample use of presets and an application suited to batch processing can seriously cut down on the time needed. For example, I was the photographer for Ryerson University's Engineering Frosh Week. I took over 2500 shots in 5 days and was able to edit, process and submit the approximately 450 chosen shots with less than 5 hours work total. Note that I did shoot JPEG for this (I always do when shooting high volumes), but even in RAW my working time would be only marginally longer as I make heavy use of presets for rendering (in-camera for JPEG, in the RAW converter for RAW). Now I happen to use CaptureOne, which is very much oriented towards batch processing (Particularly its batch colour correction capabilities), but Lightroom does quite well for batch processing as well. -- M. Adam Maas http://www.mawz.ca Explorations of the City Around Us. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
