<www.presetsheaven.com> They aren't hard to make.
2010/1/8 eckinator <eckina...@gmail.com>: > Adam, would you share those presets? Can they be exported? > Cheers > Ecke > > 2010/1/8 Adam Maas <a...@mawz.ca>: >> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Ken Waller <kwal...@peoplepc.com> wrote: >>> Agreed - that the digital workflow takes more time but at least you've got >>> the control and a much better opportunity at getting a keeper image, at >>> least as far as exposure/focus is concerned. >>> >>> Kenneth Waller >> >> Ample use of presets and an application suited to batch processing can >> seriously cut down on the time needed. For example, I was the >> photographer for Ryerson University's Engineering Frosh Week. I took >> over 2500 shots in 5 days and was able to edit, process and submit the >> approximately 450 chosen shots with less than 5 hours work total. Note >> that I did shoot JPEG for this (I always do when shooting high >> volumes), but even in RAW my working time would be only marginally >> longer as I make heavy use of presets for rendering (in-camera for >> JPEG, in the RAW converter for RAW). Now I happen to use CaptureOne, >> which is very much oriented towards batch processing (Particularly its >> batch colour correction capabilities), but Lightroom does quite well >> for batch processing as well. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
