On Jan 10, 2010, at 3:32 PM, Margus Männik wrote: > I had an opportunity to shoot in the dim winter forest with all those three > bodies some weeks ago. Honestly said, K-7 is quite a small improvement in > terms of low-light AF. K-x is much more significant step ahead. > Does Kx have the low light autofocus assist that the K7 has? I found that for shooting events like wedding receptions in low-light the K7 autofocus is far better than the K20. With the K20 I had to resort to manual focus -- or when too dim -- focus by lens barrel markings. The K7 seems to be able to handle focus in a rather dark room. Paul > BR, Margus > > > Adam Maas wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Gonz <rgonzoma...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Is there any combination of Pentax body/lens (digital) that does >>> relatively well in low light? I took my K20D and K200D to a wedding >>> and the autofocus sucked in a big way with the both a DA 12-24 and an >>> FA 50 1.4. I tried to focus manually when I noticed about 1/2 of my >>> shots were out of focus, but my eyes dont do well in bright light let >>> alone low light. >>> >>> -gonz >>> >>> >> >> Not really. The K-7 and K-x are definite improvements but no Pentax >> body has really good AF. >> >> > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions.
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
