On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Dario Bonazza <dario.bona...@virgilio.it> wrote: > Bruce Dayton wrote: > > >> Hello Larry, >> >> Seems you had two main questions: >> >> 1) how many stops better is the K-x than the K20D. >> Based on my limited testing, I'd say I don't really want to use the >> K20D past 1600 if I can help it. The K-x I'd say 6400 is about where >> I'd rather not go past. So the K-x seems to be at least 2 stops >> better than the K20D. > > Yes, at least. Probably a bit more. > >> So, could I live with just the K-x? Yes, I think I could. Of >> course, the K-x sensor in a K-7 would be the ultimate. > > Woohooo! Another good guy on the boat! Time to start a Facebook thingie? > > Dario >
I wouldn't expect the K-X sensor in an updated K-7. However there is a 14MP version of the sensor with similar high ISO performance and capable of 7fps, THAT's what I'd like to see in an updated K-7 (it's currently used in Sony's A450 and A550, the K-X shares a sensor with the A500). -- M. Adam Maas http://www.mawz.ca Explorations of the City Around Us. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
