The major thing it has going for it is 40MP... as always size trumps all.

It's a borderline fringe product.  Price is almost right. Sensor size
and resolution are right.  AF performance, can't say. Lens
compatibility is good.

The question is, will it sell in the volume it needs to be profitable,
considering many MF photographers have, annecdotally, switched brands?

Anyone who wants it for $4K (Paul), while being a bargain-hunter is
smart, certainly isn't doing Pentax any favors by denying them a
profit.

Tom C.

On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 9:28 PM, Mark Roberts <m...@robertstech.com> wrote:
> David Savage wrote:
>
>>On 10/03/2010, jtainter <jtain...@mindspring.com> wrote:
>>> http://www.dpreview.com/news/1003/10031002pentax645d.asp
>>>
>>It'll be to big and heavy for most PDML'ers.
>
> Nonsense!
> It'll be rejected at because it only shoots 1.1 frames per second and
> only goes up to ISO 1600. Everyone knows you can't take photos at
> under 5 fps and ISO 96,000.
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.
>

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to