Geez and I had to OFFER my services to get taken advantage of. Tom C.
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 9:11 AM, William Robb <war...@gmail.com> wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Sessoms" > Subject: RE: Canon S90 Remarks > > > >> ... or maybe not. Doesn't look like it has a viewfinder, and I'm not >> comfortable with the hold-it-at-arms-length-squint-at-the-little-TV-and-pray >> style of shooting. > > I didn't think I would be either, but the little Panasonic with the Leica > lens that I used in Chicago was a viewfinder-free camera. > Considering that the average P&S viewfinder has, since the dawn of time, > been akin to looking through a toilet paper roll that has a coke bottle > bottom at either end, the rear screen is rather refreshing, and one can see > what is going to be captured quite easily. > I did have the unwitting opportunity to use a variety of cameras, as it > seems very common for pretty young girls to ask you to photograph them with > their giggling pretty young girlfriends when you have a counteneance and > demeanor that is as pleasant as I have, and so I did notice that there is > some variance in screen quality. > I don't know if you would have this problem or not, but it is one I > certainly didn't mind. > But all of them seemed quite easy to use, and there was certainly no > guesswork at all regarding what was being looked at. > I guess if one actually opens one's mind and tries these things, one can > find out how very wrong one's preconceptions can be. > > William Robb > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
