Yeah, that'd work ... but "Who's going to bell the cat?"
From: "Daniel J. Matyola"
If we used photo.net, couldn't we have one "moderator" to receive all
the entries and post them in a separate gallery for every month?
Dan
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Bruce Walker <bruce.wal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Christine Nielsen wrote:
>>
>> Another thought. ?If maintaining and uploading to the PUG is a drag,
>> is there a reason why it wouldn't be housed on /something like/
>> flickr? ?Please don't shoot -- I've lurked long enough to know that
>> not everyone is a flickr fan. I'm just saying that maybe the
>> technology has evolved such since the birth of the PUG that there
>> might be some other options...?
>>
>> :)
>> -c
>
> I'm OK with Flickr for most purposes. ?But I don't think that anyone here
> will be interested in using any site that requires you to sign-up to an
> account in order to upload shots. ?That would rule out photo.net, flickr and
> probably all the other social photo sites.
>
> The PUG site design is unique in allowing essentially anonymous but
> moderated uploads.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
