My main problem is lack of skill and tate.  The next two problems are
not-enough-light and especially lousy focusing skills, so i guess that
puts the K-5 at the top of my list too.  I'd love a really huge and
fast telephoto, but I wouldn't buy one even if I could afford it,
probably, because my lifestyle is too mobile for that much awkward
weight.

BTW I have that Sigma 30mm f1.4 and I use it less and less, because
I'm *always* struggling with focus issues given the absurd
depth-of-field. But, see
http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2009/10/07/Photo-Gear#p-2  Hm,
maybe the K-5's improved autofocus would make it more interesting.

-Tim

On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Larry Colen <l...@red4est.com> wrote:
> With the exception of Godfrey, who sounds like he has achieved gear nirvana 
> and sounds like he has all the gear he needs for the photos he takes, I think 
> that most of us often run up against the limitations of what our skill can do 
> with the gear that we have. And if we're honest with ourselves, skill is 
> usually the limiting factor, sometimes it's the gear, and sometimes a certain 
> piece of kit can compensate for our own personal limitations. For example, 
> last night I was pushing the envelope of what I could do with the K-x 
> photographing backlit musicians in an otherwise nearly dark room.  I was 
> sorely missing the improved sensor, focus assist light, and focus indicators 
> of the K-r.
>
> I expect that most of us have gear wishlists that would make Bill Gates 
> credit cards cringe in terror, we also probably have "short lists" of gear 
> that we are planning on buying in the near future. Generally gear that fills 
> particular needs, and which would make a noticeable difference in photos that 
> we regularly shoot, or which would allow us to get photos that we simply 
> can't get with the gear we have.
>
> What items are on your short list, and why?
>
> At the top of my shortlist is the K-5.  I often find myself in situations 
> where even 2/3 stop of performance makes a big difference in the photos that 
> I can take. Likewise, there are times when improved autofocus would also 
> help. It would also be a lot more convenient for me to have all the features 
> that I need for different scenarios, in the same camera, rather than being 
> split between two cameras.  My K-x could go back to wearing the DA40 and 
> living in my fannypack as my "pocket camera", and the K-5 could be my primary 
> camera, and stay in my big bag, rather than aways carrying both in the big 
> bag.
>
> I've found that when shooting action, where people are moving around, a zoom 
> lens can make a huge difference.  When I'm photographing aikido, I find that 
> I need wider lenses when people are defending themselves against multiple 
> attackers, and the action covers a large portion of the mat, and moves around 
> a lot.  But when only two people are practicing, and they aren't moving 
> around a lot, my 50mm isn't quite long enough.  I suspect that a 28-105/2.8  
> would pretty much cover what I need, but since I don't know of one of those 
> the 28-75/2.8 is probably the closest to what I need.  Alternatively, if I 
> were shooting with two cameras, I could get the 50-135 on one body, and the 
> 16-50 on another.  I think that the 50-135 would do also do well with the 
> band photography I've been doing, considering how often I'm using my 77 or 
> 135 for closeups.
>
> The runner ups for my short list are:
>
> DA35 macro :  I love my DA40 for its size and sharpness, but when I carry it 
> as a walk around lens, especially on hikes in the woods, I often find myself 
> wishing it were a bit wider, and focused a bit closer.
>
> Samyang 85/1.4  :  I'm still hurting over the A* 85/1.4 that the guys wife 
> sold at work while I was waiting for him to get home from running his 
> errands.  I keep needing that little bit extra shutter speed.  I'd love a 
> modern f/1.4 lens in the 75-90mm range, but I doubt that I'd be able to 
> afford it before sensors got so fast that I no longer needed that speed.
>
> Sigma 30/1.4 :  My FA31/1.8 may be a better lens, but again, I often find 
> myself wishing I had that extra 2/3 of a stop of speed, so that I could bump 
> my shutter speed up from 1/10 to 1/15 second.
>
> Something wider than 16mm.
>
> --
> Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.
>

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to