On 7/19/2011 09:52, Darren Addy wrote:
William's shot is a nice image, but it appears to me that it was taken in a museum, under fluorescent lights with a wallpaper background.
It
that IS where it is taken (or something similar), then this is understandable and a nice representation of what was there. If it wasn't taken there and was an outdoors illuminated shot in nature, then I think the tone/color balance/tone mapping probably misrepresents the original scene in a rather unsatisfying way. Darren Addy Kearney, Nebraska
Thats interesting... THe more I look at it.. (and I'm reinserting it's link here) http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrphoto/hdrshroom.html the more I realise that what bothers me is that background.. like the studio paper that seems to be popular in some portrait photo studios. Maybe that, as much as the rendering, makes it look so false.. ann -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
