Now, now then boys. This sort of behaviour only hurts both of you. Shake hands 
and make up. It's time to come in for dinner anyway. Why I bet by tomorrow 
you'll have forgotten all about this and be playing like this never happened.
**************
Oh, sorry, I must have just had a childhood flashback or something. I'm okay 
now.

Carry on...

;-)

cheers,
frank

"What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof." -- 
Christopher Hitchens

--- Original Message ---

From: Paul Stenquist <pnstenqu...@comcast.net>
Sent: January 30, 2012 1/30/12
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net>
Subject: Re: Why Not RAW Format on ALL Digital Cameras?


On Jan 30, 2012, at 5:18 PM, William Robb wrote:

> On 29/01/2012 8:46 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>> 
>> On Jan 29, 2012, at 9:23 PM, William Robb wrote:
>> 
>>> On 29/01/2012 11:42 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> I would find the trend toward more technology disturbing if there were no 
>>>> options.
>>> But since I can focus manually at will, or I can choose to use a single 
>>> autofocus point
>>> -- with the plus of being able to choose the location of that pint --
>>> the presence of other options doesn't bother me in the least.
>>> Camera makers, for the most part, aren't brain dead. They're not going to 
>>> take away the
>>> options that many of us require. More technology is fine, since it doesn't 
>>> get in my way.
>>>> 
>>> You are thinking only in your own terms, not in the terms of photography in 
>>> general.It's hard to discuss things with someone who only has an ego 
>>> centrist viewpoint, but I'll try.
>> 
>> Ever the ass, eh Bill? Have another drink.
> 
> I was quite sober when I wrote that, are you sober now? You seem a little 
> aggressive.

In assuming you were drunk, I was giving you the benefit of the doubt. I would 
think that anyone who begins a discussion with a personal insult is either 
drunk or mindless. 


> 
>> 
>> <Egotistical nonsense snipped>
>> 
>> 
> As I said, it's hard to have a discussion with someone who is so full of 
> themselves that all they see is what they think.
> Harder still to have a discussion with someone who refuses to have a 
> discussion at all, unless it's to lay down their own dogma.
> You'd make a good Tea Bagger.
> 
> -- 
> 
> William Robb
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.
-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to