I confess I’ve never really done A-B comparisons. But here are some pictures that couldn’t have been taken on any camera I’ve owned prior to the K-5:
ISO 3200: http://goo.gl/9G9eu, http://goo.gl/7CwWU ISO 6400: http://goo.gl/9SsZQ, http://goo.gl/2wT7s, http://goo.gl/t4vlF, http://goo.gl/xQ5SK Yeah, get up to and past 3200, and there’s grain there all right. But the pictures still work just fine. -T On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Bipin Gupta <bip...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Tim, can you please explain the HUGE, BIG Difference in Improved > Low Light Performance you got from your K-5 vs the K20D for the same > photo situation by showing us some examples in terms of ISO, f-stop, > shutter speed etc or photos. > Regards. Bipin - from a far away enchanting land. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
