Check the archives. This question (or very similar ones) have been posted and answered about 3 or 4 times in the past 6 weeks. There's some good comparative info already there in the archives. To help at least just a little, here's a couple of the links (but there are plenty more)
http://www.mail-archive.com/pentax-discuss@pdml.net/msg61865.html http://www.mail-archive.com/pentax-discuss@pdml.net/msg53123.html Good luck, .jerome. On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, Peter Smekal wrote: > I'm thinking about buying a good and not too expensive "normal range" zoom > lense to use on my Z1-p. There is the SMC-FA 28-70 mm/4,0 AL which I have > seen. It seems to be quite good and not too pricy. There are also two newer > lenses, both with more tele-range: > 1) SMC-FA 24-90mm f/3.5-4.5 AL [IF] and > 2) SMC-FA 28-105/3,2-4,5 AL [IF] > At leastv here in Sweden the 24-90 is more expensive than the other two > lenses. Is it worth the extra money? > What is your opinion (humble of course) of these lenses? Any > recommendations? Have you seen any test results for the new lenses? > > Peter Smekal > Uppsala, Sweden > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
