Tradeoffs. The 60-250 is bigger and heavier. Good to carry when knowing the extra length will be needed, but otherwise the 50-135 is a delight.
Sent from my iPad On Feb 14, 2013, at 11:05 PM, Aahz Maruch <a...@pobox.com> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 14, 2013, Stan Halpin wrote: >> >> Ones that I wouldn't let go? The 77 Limited. The FA*200/4 Macro. The >> holy trinity of DA* zoom lenses: 16-50, 50-135, and 60-250. > > What do you see as the advantage of having both 50-135 and 60-250? > (Other people have said not to bother.) > -- > Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6 http://rule6.info/ > <*> <*> <*> > Help a hearing-impaired person: http://rule6.info/hearing.html > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
