My non-photographer wife likes it and prefers the 1st version. As do I.
More than a photo club exhibit; at worst as good a Thomas Hawk posting.
I might even hang it on my wall. Don't over think this one, I believe
your eye is correct and current version is suitable.
pdml-requ...@pdml.net wrote:
Message: 3
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 11:54:57 -0500
From: George Sinos<gsi...@gmail.com>
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List<pdml@pdml.net>
Subject: PESO - mailbox - interrupted pattern
Message-ID:
<CAHd=7rfbhy_glf-ytb7+g+dwesiosnfs2e7vzq79oaefqv2...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
I need a little feedback on this one. I'm not sure it's worth pursuing.
<http://www.georgesphotos.net/Other/Misc-private/1804874_X84PMn#!i=2431403562&k=nbGb2Bd&lb=1&s=A>
The lock on my mailbox broke and had to be replaced. It struck me as
something that could be used as an example of a broken pattern.
I've played with it a bit and looked at it until I'm cross-eyed. I
can't tell if it's straight and level or a tiny bit crooked. I'm also
not sure about the composition. The lock on box 7 is dead-center in
the frame, I don't think I like that. Maybe a rectangular crop
eliminating the top row of boxes might look better.
Is this worth the trouble to mess with or is it one of those "camera
club" photos that no-one but a photographer would look at?
Thanks for any input, gs.
George Sinos
--------------------
www.GeorgesPhotos.net
www.GeorgeSinos.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
