On Tue, Jul 16, 2013, Dario Bonazza wrote: > -----Messaggio originale----- From: Aahz Maruch >> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013, Dario Bonazza wrote: >>> >>>Funny, as I thought of the 16MP sensor in the K-5IIs as the second >>>most important reason to upgrade from the K-5 (the first one being >>>of course the huge improvement in AF accuracy in odd light). 16MP is >>>already more than I need and I'm happy to delay any forced pixel >>>count increase as much as possible. That's a wonderful world, isn't >>>it? >> >> The K-5 has the same sensor, doesn't it? > > Yes, but without an anti-alias filter, which means a visible jump in > resolution & sharpness when everything else (lens quality, steadiness > & focus) is at best.
Missed that you were specifically talking about the IIs. Anyway, I took both II and IIs on my Alaska cruise, will report whether I notice any difference in sharpness (although there were essentially zero duplicate shots taken with the same lens on both bodies). -- Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6 http://rule6.info/ <*> <*> <*> Help a hearing-impaired person: http://rule6.info/hearing.html -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
