I haven't asked my wife (shudder) yet. Jack 8=\
________________________________ From: Bob Sullivan <rf.sulli...@gmail.com> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> Sent: Tuesday, October 8, 2013 7:12 AM Subject: Re: K-3: And here are your OFFICIAL specs Anybody else order one yet? Bob S. On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Jack Davis <jdavi...@yahoo.com> wrote: > There is so much new and inviting to look forward to, but still, relative AF > speed and sensitivity performance are the center of my curiosity at the > moment. > > Jack > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "eactiv...@aol.com" <eactiv...@aol.com> > To: pdml@pdml.net > Cc: > Sent: Monday, October 7, 2013 8:07 AM > Subject: Re: K-3: And here are your OFFICIAL specs > > Thanks. > > That looks rather impressive. > > Marnie aka Doe :-) > > In a message dated 10/7/2013 7:44:59 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, > bruce.wal...@gmail.com writes: > Pssst: > > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2254722/PDML/K-3/PENTAX%20-%20K-3.html#! > product-highlights > > In case anyone missed it. > > > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Darren Addy <pixelsmi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> AND now the page is a 404 error. >> : ) >> >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Darren Addy <pixelsmi...@gmail.com> > wrote: >>> Thanks for the clarification, George. I agree with you; I would >>> probably also want the ability to turn that off but it will be >>> interesting to see what sort of images it produces. >>> It is amazing to me what is possible with the in-camera horsepower of >>> the PRIME III. >>> >>> I will be very interested to see what the dynamic range, etc. is for >>> this sensor/camera. If it is anywhere close to the K-5/II/IIs it is >>> probably going to be the *best* APS-C DSLR on the market (at least for >>> a week or two). >>> : ) >>> >>> It is worth remembering that other camera manufacturers also use the >>> Fujitsu Milbeaut image processor and so will be seeing a corresponding >>> jump in *their* capabilities sooner, rather than later. >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 8:06 AM, George Sinos <gsi...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> that should say "more than one correction". gs >>>> George Sinos >>>> -------------------- >>>> http://www.georgesphotos.net/ >>>> http://www.georgesinos.com/ >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 8:04 AM, George Sinos <gsi...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> Hi Darren >>>>> >>>>> This is from the "highlights" page of the K-3 page. >>>>> >>>>> "Multi-pattern white balance >>>>> >>>>> When shooting scenes that include multiple light sources, such as >>>>> sunlight and shade or flash, light sources are recognized >>>>> automatically and the image is separated into different areas. White >>>>> balance is adjusted separately in each area according to the different >>>>> light sources to achieve optimal color reproduction." >>>>> >>>>> Sounds like it makes more than correction in different parts of the > same image. >>>>> >>>>> I agree, like most other adjustments, it probably only applies to >>>>> jpgs. But, it sounds like something I would want to turn off or on as >>>>> a creative tool. I'm thinking of twilight or night shots where you >>>>> may have several types of light in the same image. >>>>> >>>>> gs >>>>> >>>>> George Sinos >>>>> -------------------- >>>>> http://www.georgesphotos.net/ >>>>> http://www.georgesinos.com/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 7:58 AM, Darren Addy <pixelsmi...@gmail.com> > wrote: >>>>>> I believe that means that you can save JPEGs from the RAW image in >>>>>> different white balance configurations easily, in camera (which is >>>>>> very cool). ALL of the information is always there in the RAW file. > IF >>>>>> that is correct, then I don't see any need to disable, because it >>>>>> won't happen automatically (saving you 9 different JPEGs at each >>>>>> preset white balance). >>>>>> >>>>>> Also, the anti-alias IS accomplished with "microscopic sensor >>>>>> vibrations", so I was wrong about that. I don't really understand how >>>>>> it can do that AND shake reduction, but we'll see how it is >>>>>> implemented. I suppose that most people are going to shoot with it > OFF >>>>>> and go for the resolution over the (rare) moire problem (unless you >>>>>> are shooting a lot of wedding dresses or something). >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 7:54 AM, George Sinos <gsi...@gmail.com> > wrote: >>>>>>> The multiple white balance corrections in a single photo sounds >>>>>>> interesting from a technical standpoint. I hope that is something >>>>>>> that can be disabled. gs >>>>>>> George Sinos >>>>>>> -------------------- >>>>>>> http://www.georgesphotos.net/ >>>>>>> http://www.georgesinos.com/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 7:31 AM, Boris Liberman <bori...@gmail.com> > wrote: >>>>>>>> Yes, I see it now. Thanks, Brian. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Brian Walters > <apathy...@lyons-ryan.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>> Quoting Boris Liberman <bori...@gmail.com>: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Oh, and BTW - no mention of PRIME III... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> There is, actually: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://www.us.ricoh-imaging.com/dslr/K-3_#!product-highlights >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> in the section headed "Fastest continuous shooting at 8.3FPS" >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Cheers >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Brian >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>>>>>> Brian Walters >>>>>>>>> Western Sydney Australia >>>>>>>>> http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>>>>>>> PDML@pdml.net >>>>>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>>>>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly > above and >>>>>>>>> follow the directions. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Boris >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>>>>>> PDML@pdml.net >>>>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>>>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above > and follow the directions. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>>>>> PDML@pdml.net >>>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above > and follow the directions. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Nothing is sure but death and Pentaxes. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>>>> PDML@pdml.net >>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above > and follow the directions. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>> PDML@pdml.net >>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Nothing is sure but death and Pentaxes. >> >> >> >> -- >> Nothing is sure but death and Pentaxes. >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > > > > -- > -bmw > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
