Yup :) Bob Sullivan <rf.sulli...@gmail.com> wrote: >Anybody else order one yet? Bob S. > >On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Jack Davis <jdavi...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> There is so much new and inviting to look forward to, but still, >relative AF speed and sensitivity performance are the center of my >curiosity at the moment. >> >> Jack >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "eactiv...@aol.com" <eactiv...@aol.com> >> To: pdml@pdml.net >> Cc: >> Sent: Monday, October 7, 2013 8:07 AM >> Subject: Re: K-3: And here are your OFFICIAL specs >> >> Thanks. >> >> That looks rather impressive. >> >> Marnie aka Doe :-) >> >> In a message dated 10/7/2013 7:44:59 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, >> bruce.wal...@gmail.com writes: >> Pssst: >> >> >https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2254722/PDML/K-3/PENTAX%20-%20K-3.html#! >> product-highlights >> >> In case anyone missed it. >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Darren Addy <pixelsmi...@gmail.com> >wrote: >>> AND now the page is a 404 error. >>> : ) >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Darren Addy <pixelsmi...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>>> Thanks for the clarification, George. I agree with you; I would >>>> probably also want the ability to turn that off but it will be >>>> interesting to see what sort of images it produces. >>>> It is amazing to me what is possible with the in-camera horsepower >of >>>> the PRIME III. >>>> >>>> I will be very interested to see what the dynamic range, etc. is >for >>>> this sensor/camera. If it is anywhere close to the K-5/II/IIs it >is >>>> probably going to be the *best* APS-C DSLR on the market (at least >for >>>> a week or two). >>>> : ) >>>> >>>> It is worth remembering that other camera manufacturers also use >the >>>> Fujitsu Milbeaut image processor and so will be seeing a >corresponding >>>> jump in *their* capabilities sooner, rather than later. >>>> >>>> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 8:06 AM, George Sinos <gsi...@gmail.com> >wrote: >>>>> that should say "more than one correction". gs >>>>> George Sinos >>>>> -------------------- >>>>> www.GeorgesPhotos.net >>>>> www.GeorgeSinos.com >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 8:04 AM, George Sinos <gsi...@gmail.com> >wrote: >>>>>> Hi Darren >>>>>> >>>>>> This is from the "highlights" page of the K-3 page. >>>>>> >>>>>> "Multi-pattern white balance >>>>>> >>>>>> When shooting scenes that include multiple light sources, such >as >>>>>> sunlight and shade or flash, light sources are recognized >>>>>> automatically and the image is separated into different areas. >White >>>>>> balance is adjusted separately in each area according to the >different >>>>>> light sources to achieve optimal color reproduction." >>>>>> >>>>>> Sounds like it makes more than correction in different parts of >the >> same image. >>>>>> >>>>>> I agree, like most other adjustments, it probably only applies >to >>>>>> jpgs. But, it sounds like something I would want to turn off or >on as >>>>>> a creative tool. I'm thinking of twilight or night shots where >you >>>>>> may have several types of light in the same image. >>>>>> >>>>>> gs >>>>>> >>>>>> George Sinos >>>>>> -------------------- >>>>>> www.GeorgesPhotos.net >>>>>> www.GeorgeSinos.com >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 7:58 AM, Darren Addy ><pixelsmi...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>>>>>> I believe that means that you can save JPEGs from the RAW image >in >>>>>>> different white balance configurations easily, in camera (which >is >>>>>>> very cool). ALL of the information is always there in the RAW >file. >> IF >>>>>>> that is correct, then I don't see any need to disable, because >it >>>>>>> won't happen automatically (saving you 9 different JPEGs at >each >>>>>>> preset white balance). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Also, the anti-alias IS accomplished with "microscopic sensor >>>>>>> vibrations", so I was wrong about that. I don't really >understand how >>>>>>> it can do that AND shake reduction, but we'll see how it is >>>>>>> implemented. I suppose that most people are going to shoot with >it >> OFF >>>>>>> and go for the resolution over the (rare) moire problem (unless >you >>>>>>> are shooting a lot of wedding dresses or something). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 7:54 AM, George Sinos <gsi...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>>>>>>> The multiple white balance corrections in a single photo >sounds >>>>>>>> interesting from a technical standpoint. I hope that is >something >>>>>>>> that can be disabled. gs >>>>>>>> George Sinos >>>>>>>> -------------------- >>>>>>>> www.GeorgesPhotos.net >>>>>>>> www.GeorgeSinos.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 7:31 AM, Boris Liberman ><bori...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>>>>>>>> Yes, I see it now. Thanks, Brian. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Brian Walters >> <apathy...@lyons-ryan.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Quoting Boris Liberman <bori...@gmail.com>: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Oh, and BTW - no mention of PRIME III... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> There is, actually: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >http://www.us.ricoh-imaging.com/dslr/K-3_#!product-highlights >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> in the section headed "Fastest continuous shooting at >8.3FPS" >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Cheers >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Brian >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>>>>>>> Brian Walters >>>>>>>>>> Western Sydney Australia >>>>>>>>>> http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>>>>>>>> PDML@pdml.net >>>>>>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>>>>>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly >> above and >>>>>>>>>> follow the directions. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Boris >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>>>>>>> PDML@pdml.net >>>>>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>>>>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly >above >> and follow the directions. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>>>>>> PDML@pdml.net >>>>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>>>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly >above >> and follow the directions. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Nothing is sure but death and Pentaxes. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>>>>> PDML@pdml.net >>>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly >above >> and follow the directions. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>>> PDML@pdml.net >>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly >above and >> follow the directions. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Nothing is sure but death and Pentaxes. >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Nothing is sure but death and Pentaxes. >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> PDML@pdml.net >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above >and >> follow the directions. >> >> >> >> -- >> -bmw >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above >and >> follow the directions. >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above >and follow the directions. >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above >and follow the directions.
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
