Peter, let me try to explain. I seem to have grown to sincerely dislike
all too often seen on the internet ocassions when following the
announcement (and sometimes even following relatively reliable rumors)
people start proclaiming very loud claims.
E.g. K-3 is not revolutionary for the industry. It is great step up for
Pentax, that's for sure. But it makes absolutely no sense to say that it
is very imaginary Nikon D400. It is not. Nor it leapfrogs the
competition. It simply does not at this time. It may in the future
should it come out devoid of any bleeding edge cuts and bruises and
should the market decidedly vote by its money in its favor.
Until then - it is all hand off review...
I hope you understand me now. And naturally, I mean no disrespect to you
or anyone else on this list. I'm merely stating my opinion on the matter.
On 10/11/2013 8:01 AM, P.J. Alling wrote:
Yes, but unlike Kennyboy, Hogan actually deserves the respect he's
given. He's a Nikon centric guy, with an occasional nod to Canon, so I
don't read his site often, but when he has something I think is worth
reading, it's usually worth reading.
On 10/11/2013 12:14 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
On 10/8/2013 5:37 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
and only a few years ago Hogan was confidently predicting Pentax's
demise, or ignoring it entirely.
C'est la vie.
All hail the hands off reviews :-).
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
