On 11/14/2013 11:41 AM, John Francis wrote:
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 11:33:07AM -0600, Walt wrote:
For me, the only thing that makes me really, really want the K-3 is
the improved focusing. Sure, I might get marginally better noise
levels in low light with my K-5 -- if I can get the thing to focus.
As it stands, though, I have to keep the K-5 simply because my
computer will buckle trying to process the 24mp files of a K-3.
But, if Ricoh were to put out a 16mp body with the K-3's focusing
system -- well, now. That would be something.
-- Walt
That's pretty much how I feel about the K3, too. I want the better
auto-focus. The extra megapixels I could probably live without most
of the time, but I wouldn't want to give up the maximum frame rate
or the increased depth of the buffer.
The trouble is that we all want different features.
Agreed -- the frame rate and buffer depth would be nice, even though I
rarely utilize those capabilities.
Still, you'd think Ricoh would have learned to cater to me a little
better by now.
-- Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
