steve harley wrote:
On 2015-03-28 17:35 , Larry Colen wrote:
Set of photos showing construction here:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157651606646662/
that's a fun project; i have shot through a small kaleidoscope (with my
old point and shoot) and simply cropped the photo, with enjoyable
results; can't easily lay my hands on an exmple; i'd think a Q would be
a good choice
The smaller lens would certainly make is less expensive.
of course the image a kaleidoscope produces is pretty deterministic, at
least if the lens is perfectly centered, so one could create even higher
resolution results with an appropriate digital image image
transformation; it seems to me it's just a step and rotate, with a
certain amount of light fall-off …
True, but I find I do a lot of composition by aiming the lens other than
axially. A friend of Zab's does digital kaleidoscope art. A bit of
google and I found her web page:
http://www.annespalter.com/
here's a technique which looks like it could be adapted to make a proper
three-mirror kaleidoscope:
<https://www.video2brain.com/en/lessons/creating-self-updating-kaleidoscopic-effects>
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com (postbox on min4est)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
