Clearly you need to purchase both. :) On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 2:48 AM, Malcolm Smith <rrve...@virginmedia.com> wrote: > Brian Walters wrote: > >> I have the 18-135 and it's become my most used lens. My 16-45 has got >> very little use since I got the 18-135. Maybe my IQ standards are not >> as stringent as those of other people but I have absolutely no problem >> with the lens. >> >> Having said that, reviews suggest the 16-85 is superior but I'd find >> that too short on the telephoto end. > > I've taken on board what folk have said, and I think if I hadn't got the > 55-300mm which I use a great deal at shorter end, there would benefit to me > going for the 18-135mm. A fair bit of the photography I'm now doing involves > horses, and when I need a bit of magnification, it often goes a little way > beyond 135mm. On the other hand, the 18-55mm is often not quite enough and > 20mm more would be useful at times. I think that's the way I might go. > Thanks Brian. > > Malcolm > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions.
-- Life is too short to put up with bad bokeh. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
