On 3 May 2002 at 6:01, Mishka wrote: > From what I understand, the registration length (or what you may call > it) of the "new lens" would be a lot less than for normal SLR. > Wouldn't a mechanical adapter (sim. to 645 to K and 67 to 645) be the > answer? You'll get to get the best of both worlds: inexpensive > equivalent of 600/4 and very small, light and fast wide angle glass. I > see no reason to worry.
Unless of course you've already spent a sh*t load of cash on wide Pentax K mount glass due to the promise of a Pentax K mount 135 full frame digital body? :-( Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications.html - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
