I agree Igor. Cutting out about half of the blank sky above the arch would be an improvement by forcing the eye to concentrate more on the arch.
-----Original Message----- >From: Igor PDML-StR <pdml...@komkon.org> >Subject: PESO: Arch > > >Dan, > >It's a fine image, nicely taken. >But from the moment I saw it, I couldn't get rid of the desire to reframe >it so that the arch would move up (leaving less empty space at the top). >I am not sure, it is likely that that would bring some portion of the >top of the arch (maybe the top of the head?) to the 2/3 horizontal line)? > >(And I understand that you've left Greece already...) > >Cheers, > >Igor > > >Daniel J. Matyola Wed, 07 Sep 2016 20:02:08 -0700 wrote: > >Architectural detail: >http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18282482&size=lg >K-5 IIs. DA 18-135 zoom >Comments invited. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
