When I saw the comments about cropping a bit (before I actually looked
at it) i moved it around to see if I agreed with the suggested trim
offthe top... which drew -my- eye to the little puff of black smoke
above the center of the top of the arch... , which caused me also to not
the blackening of thestone in some of the crannies... I accepted the
missing chink as part of the pattern.
ann
On 9/8/2016 11:34 AM, Alan C wrote:
It's interesting how people see things differently. The first thing I
focused on was the missing block.
Alan C
-----Original Message----- From: Ken Waller
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2016 5:28 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: PESO: Arch
I agree Igor. Cutting out about half of the blank sky above the arch
would be an improvement by forcing the eye to concentrate more on the
arch.
-----Original Message-----
From: Igor PDML-StR <pdml...@komkon.org>
Subject: PESO: Arch
Dan,
It's a fine image, nicely taken.
But from the moment I saw it, I couldn't get rid of the desire to
reframe
it so that the arch would move up (leaving less empty space at the top).
I am not sure, it is likely that that would bring some portion of the
top of the arch (maybe the top of the head?) to the 2/3 horizontal
line)?
(And I understand that you've left Greece already...)
Cheers,
Igor
Daniel J. Matyola Wed, 07 Sep 2016 20:02:08 -0700 wrote:
Architectural detail:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18282482&size=lg
K-5 IIs. DA 18-135 zoom
Comments invited.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
