Paul Stenquist wrote:
That’s where I’m at. Looks like Pentax shot themselves in the foot on this one.
Hope they read Dpreview and this list. What were they thinking?
They were thinking that people want a $2,000 point and shoot that does
everything for them, including all of the thinking and making all of the
decisions. I may have my challenges, but as far as I know, I'm still
smarter than a three dollar CPU.
I wish that they'd realize that people don't buy a top of the line full
frame DSLR to shoot jpegs, so optimizing the JPEG performance for people
who get just as crappy photos with a DSLR as they do with a phone,
aren't the people you should design your flagship model for.
Paul
On May 7, 2018, at 6:23 PM, jtainter<jtain...@mindspring.com> wrote:
For me, this is actually a relief. I was interested in upgrading my K-1 mainly
for improved noise performance. Now that is off the table. I didn't mind the
cost. My concern was that I have a lot of lenses, and it is a nuisance to test
them all for focus accuracy, which I would have had to do. Instead I'll just
stick with my outdated K-1, which I've been very pleased with.
Joe
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com (postbox on min4est) http://red4est.com/lrc
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
