Does anyone else see the irony of their link to "Jump to Conclusion"?
On 5/7/2018 1:06 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/pentax-k-1-ii-review
"Baked-in noise reduction results in Raw files with progressively less
detail than the original K-1 as the ISO increases. This can not be
turned off."
Yikes! Who decided _that_ was a good idea?
On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 12:49 PM, Paul Stenquist <pnstenqu...@mac.com> wrote:
Link?
Paul
On May 7, 2018, at 11:34 AM, Jan van Wijk <pen...@dfsee.com> wrote:
Just an FYI:
I was still considering upgrading my K1 to the 'II' level, for better high-ISO
performance
better AF-tracking and the 'handheld' pixel-shift.
I don't like the hassle/risk of sending it in (to Germany, from the
Netherlands) though.
Now, reading the review, it seems that the 'better' high ISO is achieved mainly
by adding noise reduction in the new accelarator chip, at the expense of detail.
(quite visible in small printed text for example).
So I will probably skip the update and save 500 Euros as well :)
I will wait for the next model, with newer sensor technology, and just enjoy
the K1 until then!
Regards, JvW
------------------------------------------------------------------
Jan van Wijk; http://www.dfsee.com
Flickr : jvw_pentax
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
--
America wasn't founded so that we could all be better.
America was founded so we could all be anything we damn well please.
- P.J. O'Rourke
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
