Mike, Do you mean that there is only one way to see a subject/scene? Are you saying that the act of observation doesn't change the subject/scene? Very curious. Bob --- mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Fernando wrote: > > > Sorry, but I couldn't see where the paradox is.. > > and Bob S. wrote: > > > Think about the opposite. > > amongst others. > > My apologies for not making myself clear. > > The paradox for me is at least two fold. I cannot > represent > what I see as well as I see it, either because I > have to > concentrate on a portion of it to try to bring out > one of the > qualities of what I see or the medium is not capable > of > reproducing at least one of the qualities I want to > show. > > Secondly, the very act of trying to produce a > representation of > what I am seeing interferes with my viewing of the > scene/phenomenon/whatever. > > I suspect that the second is the more important; it > is certainly > the reason a number of people have given to me for > not being > interested in photography. > > mike > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. > To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. > Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at > http://pug.komkon.org . >
===== What boots up must come down. Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
