;No offense taken. But I do like the results at 4800. And with a 35mm transparency of neg, that gives me an image large enough to print a 12 x18 with some adjustment. Here’s a full res scan of a 50 year old BW negative that I scanned for publication.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/llpqbbl42ayaste/shake.8..jpg?dl=0 > On May 1, 2023, at 1:22 PM, Ralf R Radermacher <fotor...@gmx.de> wrote: > > Am 01.05.23 um 18:06 schrieb Paul Stenquist: >> Perhaps, but I don’t scan charts. I scan photos, and I like the results I >> get at 4800 when printed, not pixel peeking. > > Sorry. Won't happen again. > > Ralf > > -- > Ralf R. Radermacher - Köln/Cologne, Germany > Blog : http://the-real-fotoralf.blogspot.com > Audio : http://aporee.org/maps/projects/fotoralf > Fotos : https://www.fotocommunity.de/user_photos/770012 > -- > %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List > To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
