>From what I read in the professional photographers forums (not PJ's), most film including MF is becoming the providence of fine art and amateur photographers. I see a lot of, "I shot one roll of film last year" type of comments. I would not make a digital/film decision based upon what pros are doing. They have different demands and requirements placed on their images. Once digital became "good enough" (which it did a couple of years ago), the issue of which gives a better image became irrelevant. Aside from wedding/affair photographers, most photographer's images do not wind up on film in their final form. They are in printed and images are handled in digital format for printing. Most of the comments I read here knocking digital are from folks that seem to have limited first hand experience with state of the art digital imaging devices.
From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I don't believe that digicams will replace MF in the near future, I'm not planning on selling my 67 gear too soon, my Pentax 35mm gear maybe another story though :-(
