I'd love to be able to agree. I think this probably depends on the scanner. My Pacific Image Primefilm 3600 "Pro" does a decent job on slides provided there is not dark detail to wring out. It poops all over dark slides, but then I got it for about $500. Its limitations have turned me into a die-hard negative film shooter, which I purty much was before I bought it. I mean, used Pentaxes are _cheap_, Gold 100 is _cheap_, and I'm a _cheap_ ole fart...
-Lon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I hear you Paul. This summer I did a lot of work for a client and used print > exclusively for many of the same reasons you mention. I don't find scanning > negs any easier than slides though. In fact, I think I like my scanned slides > better than the negs, but the nice thing about having a film scanner is it no > longer really matters if its slide or negs. The end result (digital image or > print) is more or less the same. > Vic
