Hi Pål, (I have just browsed my ASCII-tables for the right å: AltGr+134 ;-))
on 18 Nov 02 you wrote in pentax.list: >The MZ-S has a significantly better viewfinder thatn any other Pentax >AF camera. It uses the same type screens as the new LX screens. The >only "controversial" issue with the MZ-S viewfinder might be the >magnification. I didn't know that there are old and new LX screens. How do I difference between them? >> against this. So the MZ-S might be the final flagship. >Why? Althoug sales of higher end film slr's are dropping the manufacturers >still need to make both digital and film slr from the same parts bin. It is >the only way not to break the back on a digital slr. In the foreseeable >future DSLR market share will still be largely Mpix/dollar which means there >is resistance of putting newexpensive technology and features in a digital >slr before it's payed for, or getting revenues from, a film slr sibling. >It's no coincidence that the EOS-1Ds is based on the EOS-1V; the D100 on the >F80; D1 on the F100; the Contax Digital on the N1 etc. I have no doubts that >the coming Pentax digital slr won't be in the absolute high-end, but if >Pentax have ambitions of doing more than make initial sales of a digital slr >for old K-mount users, they need new features as well. I agree that this platform strategy seems to be necessary. But I guess that the new models will be settled below the MZ-S. As we have discussed some time ago, the MZ-S seems to be a quite successfull niche product ("seems" as we don't have actual figures from Pentax). For a larger market than that niche it is too expensive. For a large pro-market it is nor "pro" enough. What makes the MZ-S so special for me is its build quality and the metal chassis. This is also what makes it so expensive. The Pentax DSLR shouldn't be a niche product. This is a growing market and there are many semi-professional users waiting for an affordable DSLR. So its analogue sibling won't be a niche product, either. This new chassis should be less expensive than the MZ-S in order to address a bigger market. Let's make some calculations: EOS-1D: 6500,- Euro EOS-1V: 2000,- Euro digital extra: 225% D100: 2500,- Euro F80: 500,- Euro digital extra: 400% D1: 5000,- Euro F100: 1500,- Euro digital extra: 233% So the digital addon to an analogue SLR seems to cost something between 200 and 400% of the conventional camera. If the Pentax DSLR will really cost only 1600,- Euro, than the analogue sibling would cost between 530 and 320 Euro. This can definitely be no MZ-S competitor. It would be a plastics chassis comparable to the MZ-3/5/6. >I strongly suspect that the new slr to be shown next year will replace the >MZ-5n, MZ-3 Might be. But what about the MZ3/5-niche of the "classic" user interface? Will Pentax release a DSLR with classic user elements? Or will they drop thsi concept? >and the MZ-S even if it sounds incredible. Really;-) I guess that the MZ-S will stay a unique product in Pentax's line-up. As the LX was some years ago. >If Pentax chose not to introduce the KAF3 lens mount with this camera, >then I suspect that the camera might be the MZ-1 and it will be >augmented in the slr line-up with it's digital sibling, which might or >might not have similar features, and the MZ-60 and the MZ-6. I don't think that the new models will have much to do with the MZ-line- up. The UK-based reports speak against this. I assume a complete new design with similar functions as the MZ-6 has. I would appreciate KAF3 but I wonder if they can realize it in this first step and to that price... >I might be wrong though... Who not? Regards, Heiko