As one who has gone over to the "dark side", I agree with all that Brad
said.  99SE SP6 was very stable and the autorouter was no worse than the
current one.  AD6 has many improvements over 99SE but very few are "must
have".  If I had to go back to 99SE, it would be a small step that while
not painless, I would do it with little complaint. 


Regards, 
Steve Smith 
Product Engineer 
Staco Energy Products Co. 
Web Site: www.stacoenergy.com 
& www.stacopower.com

DISCLAIMER AND/OR CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: 
This message, including any attached materials, is intended solely for
the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may
contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from
disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this electronic mail
transmission is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
please e-mail or call Staco Energy Products Co. at (937) 253-1191. Thank
you for your cooperation.



-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Brad Velander
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 12:27 PM
To: Protel EDA Discussion List
Subject: Re: [PEDA] it's been years but I am back

Tom,
        Yes, 99SE with SP6 is quite stable and reliable. That said, it
has it's own minor quirks and gotchas much the same as all PCB CAD
software. I constantly monitor the Altium AD/DXP forum, while it has a
lot of nice, more powerful, features they also each have their own bugs,
problems, limitations and faults. AD/DXP is definitely still a work in
progress, very disappointing after 6 years or more.

        I my opinion AD/DXP has added too many fancy features at once
and Altium just doesn't have the resources to do all those features
reliably, completely without major bugs at one time. Even now they still
have not stabilized a lot of the basics like 3D import/export/modelling,
GDI/shading, memory leaks/general stability, ODB++, embedded panels,
autorouter, length matching/diff pair control, etc..

        That said I am willing to switchover to the darkside any time my
employer sees fit to put out the expenditure, can't keep flogging an old
nag and expect to run with the other quarter horses.

Sincerely,
Brad Velander
Senior PCB Designer
Northern Airborne Technology


-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Robinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 8:59 AM
To: Protel EDA Discussion List
Subject: Re: [PEDA] it's been years but I am back


I was told that Protel 99se was an excellent program, do users agree or
are they glad it's gone?


-tr


 
____________________________________________________________
You are subscribed to the PEDA discussion forum

To Post messages:
mailto:[email protected]

Unsubscribe and Other Options:
http://techservinc.com/mailman/listinfo/peda_techservinc.com

Browse or Search Old Archives (2001-2004):
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
Browse or Search Current Archives (2004-Current):
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]


 
____________________________________________________________
You are subscribed to the PEDA discussion forum

To Post messages:
mailto:[email protected]

Unsubscribe and Other Options:
http://techservinc.com/mailman/listinfo/peda_techservinc.com

Browse or Search Old Archives (2001-2004):
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
Browse or Search Current Archives (2004-Current):
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Reply via email to