Hi Jon, list, Despite your noble efforts to address it, the problem continues to persist. It appears it doesn't even matter that you're right.
What would you say is a best strategy for fixing the problem of communicating Peirce correctly other than what you or anyone else is doing? Are they even doing the same as you? Best, Jerry On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Jon Awbrey <jawb...@att.net> wrote: > Post : Abduction, Deduction, Induction, Analogy, Inquiry : 10 > > http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2016/03/04/abduction-deduction-induction-analogy-inquiry-10/ > Date : March 4, 2016 at 3:30 pm > > Peircers, > > Continuing efforts to clarify the distinctive character and > role of abductive reasoning within the well-formed inquiry. > > Re: Beyond Experiment > http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=8323 > • Scott Church > http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=8323&cpage=1#comment-221819 > > Names are not important of course, except for the purpose of > communication. The important thing is for us to distinguish > hypothesis formation from hypothesis evaluation. Now, there > happens to be a long tradition of using the word “abduction” > to distinguish that former, most incipient stage of inquiry > and I think it serves communication to preserve that tradition. > > Concepts, hypotheses, and theories have to be formed, logically > speaking, before they can be evaluated. In complex inquiries > extending over long periods of time, formation, evaluation, and > re-formation will of course proceed in cascades of parallel and > series operations, but the analytic distinction between elements > and mixtures is still worth its salt. > > The role of ab-, de-, in-duction in the cycle of inquiry > is discussed a bit further in the following article: > > • InterSciWiki • Inquiry > http://intersci.ss.uci.edu/wiki/index.php/Inquiry > > Resources > ========= > > • Prospects for Inquiry Driven Systems > > http://intersci.ss.uci.edu/wiki/index.php/Prospects_for_Inquiry_Driven_Systems > > • Introduction to Inquiry Driven Systems > > http://intersci.ss.uci.edu/wiki/index.php/Introduction_to_Inquiry_Driven_Systems > > • Functional Logic : Inquiry and Analogy > > http://intersci.ss.uci.edu/wiki/index.php/Functional_Logic_:_Inquiry_and_Analogy > > Regards, > > Jon > > -- > > academia: http://independent.academia.edu/JonAwbrey > my word press blog: http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/ > inquiry list: http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/ > isw: http://intersci.ss.uci.edu/wiki/index.php/JLA > oeiswiki: http://www.oeis.org/wiki/User:Jon_Awbrey > facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/JonnyCache > > > ----------------------------- > PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON > PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to > peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L > but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the > BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm > . > > > > > >
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
