On 2/20/2019 12:22 PM, g...@gnusystems.ca wrote:
GF: I can’t find any trace of /phaneroscopic/ observation in that presentation, at the conclusion or anywhere else. What I see throughout is /observation of diagrams/ as a key element of formal or deductive logic,
Yes. That was not the focus of the talk. But the analysis of the phaneron is a direct corollary. See the citations in the last few slides. In particular, look at the article by the psychologist Philip Johnson-Laird. I have been discussing related issues with him, and I sent him a copy of a recent article which he liked very much. See also "The virtual reality of the mind": http://jfsowa.com/talks/vrmind.pdf There's much more to say about all these issues. John
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
